Both parties fall to corruption
Published: September 2, 2008
I cannot give Nelson Graves a pass on his assertion that “Virginia voters are tired and fed up with power-hungry, scandal-driven national Republicans” (“Change in the Valley,” Aug. 28).
I am sorry, Mr. Graves, but the major Democratic campaign theme that Republicans have allowed a “culture of corruption” in the House and Senate is no more than a convenient ruse to draw attention away from their own problems.
Let’s take a little look, shall we? The Clintons alone are a guidebook on ethical misdeeds, from illegal campaign contributions and sexual harassment to perjury before a grand jury, a crime that puts most of us in jail.
Sen. Edward Kennedy’s actions at Chappaquiddick are not forgotten, nor are Sandy Berger’s theft of classified documents from the National Archives or the Democratic National Committee’s accepting illegal foreign contributions with a resulting fine of nearly $750,000.
For corruption we have William Jefferson, John Conyers and Robert Torricelli. Sexual misconduct honors go to John Edwards, Barney Frank, James McGreevey, the Rev. Jesse Jackson, Eliot Spitzer, Gary Condit and Mark Foley, to name only a few.
For sure we are all subject to the same weaknesses. Don’t try to make it sound as though Democrats are not major contributors to a “culture of corruption.”
Charles Salembier
Waynesboro
Editor’s note: Mark Foley, of Florida, is a former Republican representative in the House.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Didn’t read Mr. Graves’column, but ... seems to me that the one who wants to boost the GOP in ‘08 shouldn’t be debating ethics and corruption. We have ourselves a VP candidate who is in the middle of a major ethics scandal that she has answered by hiring a lawyer to argue on her behalf that the ongoing investigation into the matter involving her alleged firing of an administrator who did not act as she wanted him to in a case involving her ex-brother-in-law should be handed over to a public body over which she has the power of appointment.
For those keeping score at home, then - she is alleged to have pressured the administrator to have fired her ex-brother-in-law, he resisted the pressure, she fired him, she is now being investigated for it by the state legislature, which is controlled by Republicans, mind you, and she wants the investigation neutered.
And this letter writer invokes the Clintons? This would make Nixon blush, it’s so brash and underhanded and sneaky and dirty. And somehow, some way, the GOP is selling this candidate as “a reformer.“
Incredulous doesn’t begin to describe how a lot of us feel about this baloney.

Advertisement