Dramatic reveal

Dramatic reveal
» 18 Comments | Post a Comment

A cover will drape the façade of the Wayne Theatre until the front of the brick structure is illumined in a ceremony tonight in Waynesboro, but inside and beyond hard work remains, and around the project, political winds still swirl.

The unveiling of the new façade marks the completion of the first phase of an $8 million project that has molded political alliances, spurred council clashes and stirred passions among voters in elections throughout the second half of the last decade.

A year of work remains and $1.4 million still is needed to finish refurbishing the historic edifice facing West Main Street in the heart of downtown. 

That work includes restoring the theater’s roof, the root of an old wound that festered again this week during a council work session.

The council, under a previous majority more than two years ago, approved $300,000 in city money for the Wayne after former Mayor Tom Reynolds said the money urgently was needed to repair the roof.

In fact, a resolution, passed 3-2 on April 30, 2007, backing the money for the Wayne, cited “a failing roof structure that is currently compromising the structural integrity of this historic landmark.”

Two years and almost four months later, the roof has yet to be repaired, a sore point for Vice Mayor Frank Lucente, who opposed the 2007 resolution along with Tim Williams.

“I just don’t understand why if that money was needed because the roof needed to be repaired so badly that it hasn’t been done,” Lucente said Thursday.

The building is sound enough for work to continue on the restoration but the roof still leaks, said Clair Myers, executive director of the Wayne Theatre Alliance,  formed in 2000 to drive fundraising for the project.

Work on the roof has not started because the fly loft and wings, which would essentially cut the building in half, still must be built, Myers said.

The money wasn’t used for the roof because if repairs were made to it, and then it was cut in half for the subsequent work, “we’d just be throwing the money away,” Myers said.

“The smart thing to do,” he said, “was to do the front façade and then get ready to do the whole project.”

Responding to Lucente, Myers added: “His money has not been wasted one way or the other.”

Lucente, at Wednesday’s council work session, sought to tie the Wayne to discussion about the incomplete streetscape project, which theater officials ardently back. Councilwomen Nancy Dowdy and Lorie Smith accused Lucente of playing politics with the streetscape project and said the theater was irrelevant to the discussion.  Lucente said that with little traffic downtown, the streetscape should not be a priority, especially when few businesses would benefit from it.

“I understand it would be good for the Wayne Theatre to have that streetscape,” Lucente said. He remains opposed to any more money being spent on the theater. Williams and Councilman Bruce Allen took similar positions, leading to the conservative faction’s election victories last year.

Myers called Lucente’s response to the streetscape “disturbing.” Failing to finish that project on West Main Street from Wayne Avenue to Church Street would impact the ability of people to go in and out of the theater, Myers said. He expects the Wayne will open by 2011.

Dowdy said she sees the theater as an economic development venture.

She, along with Smith and then-Mayor Tom Reynolds, supported allocating the $300,000 from the city for the roof repair. The money, Dowdy said, represents what she said is her trust that the alliance’s board of directors and those doing the construction work are the ones best able to determine what the phases of the work should be.

If the alliance somehow doesn’t live up to a performance measures agreement and the theater’s ownership reverts back to the city, Dowdy said, “it will become a multi-million dollar investment for us.”

“I don’t feel like we’re risking the city’s money,” Dowdy said.

Myers added that the $2.3 million already pledged in the capital campaign does not come from the city, but from private individuals, corporations or foundations.

The façade work cost about $500,000, and the alliance has spent about $1 million so far to cover the cost of architectural plans and consultants working on the project.

Myers said that once the capital campaign is complete, the alliance could go to a financial institution and borrow money against the historic tax and enterprise zone credits, which are reimbursed once a certificate of occupancy is issued.

Interior work is under way inside the Wayne, including the demolition of the balcony and the installation of new steel work to support the new balcony. Myers said new entrances would also be cut from the parking lot into the theater. Work will also continue on the lobby, and an interior lobby area in the gallery.

“You will be able to come in off the parking lot on the west side and you will be able to see straight through the theater,” Myers said.

At that point, Myers said the fly loft and wings of the theater would be built, which will be “probably a four story building that we’re going to have to build back there.”

All that work, including the roof, is estimated to cost $1.5 million, he said.

The new façade, Myers said, will look nearly identical to the one on the building when it opened in January 1926, only now there will be more lighting.

“This is a major investment in downtown,” Myers said. “If we had anybody else coming in from the outside putting in an $8 million project on Main Street, there’d be joy in the City Council and they wouldn’t be worrying about a streetscape. They’d be trying to do it right away for them.”

Advertisement

 
View More: waynesboro city council,wayne theatre,facade,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Elvis on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 am

History Buff, it’s Dowdy, not Downy… (As in when you say, “Downeys an idiot.“)  Downy is a frabric softener that smells snuggle fresh.  And be truthful, did you really count 189 people?

Flag Comment Posted by DT Investor on August 24, 2009 at 3:03 pm

You make a good point. If there is to be trust among the stake holders then there must be accountability. They should have gone back to Council with a request to redirect the funds for all of the good reasons they had if for no other reason than to instill trust and credibility.

Flag Comment Posted by HISTORY BUFF on August 24, 2009 at 1:51 pm

I agree with you len.  We got to get the streetscape finished.  and the wall of shame.  but am not so sure, even though i am a fan of the Wayne, if they should have taken that money that the city said goes to the roof and put it elsewhere.  Maybe a good decision but maybe the start of something wrong with government and money going to private enterprizes.

Flag Comment Posted by DT Investor on August 24, 2009 at 1:32 pm

Ok, let’s leave the personal stuff out of the discussion. The fact is, if there are no more jobs in Waynesboro then there is no more tax base. This issue is about growing our tax base and bringing new industry and jobs to our town. Over the past 10 yrs WDDI has created a well researched comprehensive plan for the revitalization of downtown. A plan based on proven techniques that has resulted in successfully revitalized downtowns stretching across America during the past 30 years. There have been more new businesses and higher levels of private investments made in Waynesboro’s downtown in the past 10 yrs than there had been during the previous 25. The funny thing is those new businesses and private investments are located where? On the stretch of Main Street that has the streetscape completed. WDDI’s goal is to create a critical mass of people living, working and entertaining downtown. The Mill at South River project didn’t just happen. It is the result of 10 years of hard work and focus on the downtown plan. They need support from City Hall (who happens to be the largest land holder downtown) to succeed in creating news jobs. I own quit a bit of property downtown and pay significant taxes to the city of Waynesboro. Over a ten year period I will pay enough taxes to cover over 10% of the cost of streetscape. I’m not a resident of Waynesboro so I cannot vote nor do I consume services from the city other than police and fire protection.  So if my investment does not continue to grow why would I stay in Waynesboro when I could make a higher return on my investment somewhere else? What am I getting for my tax dollars? What benefit do the folks who have lost their jobs get when I move my business, put more folks out of work and sell my properties? One of the arguments against spending tax dollars on the streetscape, the greenway and the Wayne Theatre is that taxpayers want their tax dollars invested in “more important” things. This taxpayer wants his tax dollars invested in projects that will create jobs and value for the community. Otherwise I’ll make my investments elsewhere. Incidentally you should dig a little deeper into the $6M spent so far. They have completed a whole bunch of internal work in addition to the façade work.

Flag Comment Posted by The Spartan on August 24, 2009 at 12:46 pm

I just went back and re-read the article. They have spent $6.6 million on the theater and This front is all they have to show for it. I think someone should do an audit of the books. A good contractor could have built it from the ground up for less money than that.

Flag Comment Posted by The Spartan on August 24, 2009 at 12:21 pm

Well DT. When I am wrong I apologize, but I worked for the same company as she did so I know what I am talking about. I don’t mean to get personal, if you read the article she voted to give the $300,000. The point I have been trying to make is there better things to spend money on than the Wayne Theater, the Streetscape and the sidewalk to nowhere.

Flag Comment Posted by DT Investor on August 24, 2009 at 10:05 am

WOW! What a bunch of unsupported crap! Blueboy2 why is it that this discussion has to be personal? The fact is that MS. Dowdy was elected BY THE PEOPLE, no different than the others on council. She is privy to information that we do not have when making decisions, just like all other elected officials, then places her vote based on her best assessment of the facts. I may not agree with all of the decisions made by council but heck, I respect their commitment of time and the personal risk they run trying to do the right thing (like having your reputation soiled by someone who is shooting from the hip for trying to do the best for your community). If you do not have anything factual to add to the discussion then don’t say anything at all. Which brings me to roadie - get your facts straight before you point fingers or accuse people of “padding their wallets”. It does not help our community to take personal shots at people or make accusations without having the facts. We have enough crap going around this community to drive the discussion into the gutter without the help of someone who doesn’t even live here anymore. You mentioned how nothing gets done in the community. Well, here is your answer – everyone spends so much time beating down our elected officials and creating unsubstantiated rancor that we cant’ get anything moving. I believe MS. Dowdy deserves an apology!

Flag Comment Posted by roadie on August 24, 2009 at 9:11 am

Here is my point. everybody seems to be worryer about the new shopping center coming to town. instead of fixing the history in the town.now the wayne theater is a place everyone whould meet up at on sat.night and on sundays after church. it is where i got my frist kiss just like most of you all in that town .if all that needs to be fixed then just fix it . but it should not cost no more then $10.000 dollers to do and not $300.000 dollers. this is just telling me some body is lining there bank acct. with money to fix my hone town. i have been back there and every time i come home. there is stuff started but it nevers seems to get done . why is that????????. where is the money going now back to the roof . i know that there are roofers in that town that need work. here is a good one i worked for . bo moonyham look him up.he may do or he know some who will . now ask the mayoy TOM RENOLDS where is the money going . and don’t start something if you are not going to finsh it. and if don’t know what i mean just walk up and down the streets of WAYNESBORO
                B.CLEVELAND
                WAYNESBORO VA.
                    &
                LAVERGNE TN

Flag Comment Posted by The Spartan on August 23, 2009 at 2:50 pm

I have known Nancy Dowdy for many years. At work she volunteered for every committee they formed just to get out of doing her job. Then she wanted to have a kick-off lunch or dinner to get things started. She was all for spend, spend, spend. I rode by the Wayne yesterday and I can’t see where it was improved very much for the amount of money spent on it. I still say it is a white elephant.

Flag Comment Posted by HISTORY BUFF on August 23, 2009 at 12:17 pm

sorry for the typos.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News Video

Advertisement