The News Virginian goes negative

» 3 Comments | Post a Comment

It seems that the paper is bound and determined to take a negative position on the recent Augusta County reassessment, one that just doesn’t seem to follow the facts. Not the facts that are being printed, the individual outlying cases, but the averages.

The average assessment in Augusta County rose 27.7 percent in the last four years. That seems like a lot based on the current housing market and this newspaper is happy to point out over and over that other local jurisdictions only went up 3 percent to 5 percent. However, that accounts for only the last TWO years in towns like Waynesboro. In the last reassessment two years ago, in the middle of the housing spike, the rise in Waynesboro was more than 35 percent on average. Add to the recent increase of 3 percent to 5 percent and you get an average change closer to 40 percent plus over the last four years, which makes Augusta’s 27.7 percent look downright pedestrian. My own Waynesboro property assessment rose more than 30 percent in the last four years, with a 6-percent increase in this cycle.

According to the data cited by The News Virginian and provided by RealWaynesboro.com, the average sales price in 2005 for Augusta County was $186,042. The average sale in 2008 was $223,556. The change? Plus 20.1 percent, not far from the assessment. Like it or not, we haven’t given back all the gains made in the housing boom, not yet anyway.

The action being demanded by The News Virginian, Francis Chester and others just seems out of proportion with the facts. File appeals, certainly. Take them all the way to court, if necessary. Demand that the supervisors lower the tax rate to offset the assessment. Perhaps reconsider the interval for assessments. But don’t throw it out with the bathwater, because it just isn’t that wrong.

Alex Stevens
Waynesboro

Advertisement

 
View More: reassessment 2008 letters,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by The Spartan on February 27, 2009 at 7:10 pm

Oakave, who said the seller had to pay any back taxes. You set the rate on the sale price for future taxes. Some states are already doing this.

Flag Comment Posted by Oakave on February 27, 2009 at 4:18 pm

What an absurd comment from blueboy. Shall we wait until the property is sold and then charage the seller for all the years in which he/she did not pay taxes based on the real market value of the house?

Apparently logic and facts do not make much of an impact on those determined to follow their orthodoxy.

Flag Comment Posted by The Spartan on February 27, 2009 at 8:37 am

Thanks for nothing Mr. Stevens. I don’t remember seeing or hearing you fighting your re-assessment. You get what you ask for. Because the people in the county are standing up and fighting for something they believe in, you have no right to admonish them. What a house sells for is not the true value of a house. That is the value someone is willing to pay to own it. To me a dime is a dime, but to a coin collector it can be worth a fortune.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News Video

Advertisement